The tentative labor deal announced Tuesday between United Parcel Service and the Teamsters union is a win for the company and the economy, but not necessarily the stock, analysts say.
Shares of UPS
UPS,
were down 1.4% on Tuesday, and edged 0.04% lower on Wednesday. And while the deal would raise workers’ pay and remove the threat of a strike that risked miring the U.S. economy in further shipping delays and higher costs, one analyst said investors were still trying to parse the impact on the bottom line from more than three months of negotiations.
“This is a good thing for the economy,” Jason Miller, a professor of supply-chain management at Michigan State University, told MarketWatch. “It shows to me that the Teamsters were definitely in a strong bargaining position.”
Workers over the past two years have also been better able than normal to command higher pay from employers hoping to retain talent and had more room to entertain employment options elsewhere. But labor laws generally favor employers in employee efforts to organize.
The deal, if approved, would raise full-time drivers’ average top pay rate rise to $49 per hour. Current part-timers would have their pay raised to at least $21 per hour immediately. However, on social media, some workers felt the Teamsters could have fought to get more for UPS’ part-timers.
Talks between UPS and the Teamsters, which represents more than 340,000 UPS drivers and logistics workers, began in April, with the union vowing to strike if a deal couldn’t be reached by July 31. The agreement announced Tuesday still requires a broader vote from Teamster members. The voting process begins in August.
The agreement follows others in the nation’s railroad industry — where some workers were also reluctant to accept a deal — and the West Coast ports. Both are crucial points in the nation’s supply chain responsible for delivering goods to customers and businesses.
The labor deals, tentative or actual, arrived after what was a supply-chain crisis for most businesses two years ago translated into a profit windfall for shipping companies that were able to charge a premium amid the disruption. Workers have complained that their employers, ever under pressure from investors, have been reluctant to share those profits, skimping on time-off policies and seeking ways to slim down the labor force.
Miller also said that UPS stood to lose around 30% of its package volumes to competitors, like FedEx Corp.
FDX,
the U.S. Postal Service and regional deliverers, were a strike to occur. A strike would have hit a variety of industries shipping high-value products, he added — from electronics to clothing to spare auto parts. Health care, he said, was the most serious.
“The health-care sector was the one that I think most of us were the most scared about,” he said. “UPS is a critical shipper for time-sensitive pharmaceuticals, reagents, biologics, et cetera. That would have been very difficult to divert those volumes.”
Some Wall Street analysts thought both sides would eventually get a deal done. But the negotiations were often tense, and at one point stalled, and some UPS Teamsters held “practice pickets” amid the friction. FedEx said those tensions “opened a lot of doors” for the company.
“We’re having a lot of great conversations with legacy UPS customers and we feel really good about the sales pipeline because of the strong value proposition we have versus our primary competitor,” Brie Carere, FedEx’s chief customer officer, said on the package deliverer’s earnings call last month.
Following the announcement of the deal between UPS and the Teamsters, the National Retail Federation, an industry group, said it was “grateful” both sides came to a tentative agreement. But Wall Street analysts on Tuesday said they were staying cautious until they could gauge the financial impact. Shareholders, they said, were likely to follow suit.
Evercore analyst Jonathan Chappell cautioned that all of the information on the deal, so far, had come from the Teamsters, and that health-care and pension contributions weren’t addressed in the union’s press release announcing the agreement. He said in a note Tuesday that he would be waiting to hear from both sides before he adjusted financial estimates on UPS. And while package costs could rise a bit more than expected, UPS could pull other levers to contain them.
“We are unsure what type of cost inflation was baked into the UPS 2023 guidance range, though given the above it does appear that the new contract terms would have exceeded internal expectations,” he said. “As a result, we would expect the 2023 guide to be reeled in a bit on August 8,” when UPS reports quarterly results.
“All told, it is great news for UPS (and the U.S. economy) that a strike was averted, but we remain on the sidelines until we receive final clarity on the impact from this long-awaited agreement,” he continued.
Stephens analyst Jack Atkins echoed that sentiment.
“While we believe the removal of a potential strike is a positive for UPS and its customers, until investors gain a clearer picture of the potential net dilution from this agreement and these negotiations have had on UPS’ market share, we look for the stock to remain range bound,” he said.
Shares of UPS are up 6.2% so far this year. By comparison, the S&P 500 Index
SPX,
is up 19.7% over that period.
This post was originally published on Market Watch
